H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-6

Lindsay Davenport holds a 6–0 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2007 Quebec City semifinal 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 3, 2007* Quebec City WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #126 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #24 Match data
Aug 22, 2004* Cincinnati WTA 1000 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-3 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #9 Match data
Jun 30, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lindsay Davenport #5 6-4 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #14 Match data
Jan 28, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-1 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #13 Match data
Jan 16, 2004* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 1-6 6-2 7-5 Vera Zvonareva #13 Match data
Apr 12, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Lindsay Davenport #5 7-6(3) 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 — — — — — — — 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 — — — — — — — 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —