H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1

Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
Russia Age 42 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #349 6-1 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #29 Match data Jan 18, 2006* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vera Zvonareva #292 #2 7,935 2,089 466 270 63.3% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,848 0 1 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,926 0 2 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,681 0 3 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,886 0 5 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,938 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2008 63–23 73.3% #7 2,024 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,936 0 9 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,055 0 10 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,948 0 12 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43
27 2012 11–10 52.4% #95 1,847 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,772 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,688 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,689 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,707 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,682 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,733 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,764 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,719 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #292 1,648 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vera Zvonareva Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 2000 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 2003 19 14 33 57.6% 21 6 27 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 2004 35 18 53 66.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2007 26 12 38 68.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 47 18 65 72.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 31 11 42 73.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 37 12 49 75.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2011 42 16 58 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
27 2012 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 6 3 9 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320 185 505 63.4% 100 55 155 64.5% 38 23 61 62.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 483/704 of Vera Zvonareva's and 84/104 of Martina Hingis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vera Zvonareva Martina Hingis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 12/67 1.8 2.9 63.2% 66.5% 49.6% 59.9% 50.5% 59.9% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 13/81 3.2 5.2 55.1% 70.0% 43.0% 60.1% 47.6% 57.6% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 15/42 2.3 3.6 57.0% 70.3% 51.1% 58.3% 51.2% 61.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 38/59 2.6 2.7 59.3% 64.2% 45.7% 47.3% 49.2% 56.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 37/44 1.9 4.1 58.8% 67.9% 48.4% 51.5% 52.8% 59.8% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 67/86 2.2 3.9 60.8% 68.8% 48.8% 53.1% 56.3% 60.9% 48.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 43/48 2.1 4.0 62.9% 68.5% 46.8% 60.9% 52.8% 60.7% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 62/67 2.2 3.1 65.1% 67.0% 48.5% 55.9% 50.3% 60.6% 47.7% 2006 54/72 1.5 2.3 63.9% 63.4% 52.8% 56.5% 51.8% 59.3% 49.6%
26 2011 67/76 3.0 4.1 60.6% 69.9% 45.2% 54.3% 50.4% 60.1% 46.9% 2007 30/32 1.8 2.5 65.3% 65.3% 49.8% 55.4% 50.1% 59.7% 48.6%
27 2012 17/21 1.8 4.5 63.3% 63.7% 45.6% 53.7% 57.2% 56.9% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 8/8 2.8 4.3 63.3% 60.9% 41.6% 37.9% 26.3% 53.7% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 15/15 2.2 4.7 62.9% 61.5% 44.9% 53.8% 49.2% 55.1% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 4/4 0.5 2.5 67.7% 68.1% 52.8% 56.0% 49.5% 63.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 15/15 1.7 3.4 61.8% 58.9% 47.4% 51.4% 50.0% 54.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 13/13 1.6 4.3 65.3% 61.5% 43.8% 53.7% 46.1% 55.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 10/10 2.2 2.0 63.7% 64.2% 49.2% 59.5% 54.3% 58.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 21/22 1.8 3.4 67.1% 62.3% 41.4% 50.3% 50.8% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 11/11 1.4 3.5 66.6% 60.0% 48.4% 53.8% 45.5% 56.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 12/12 0.5 4.2 61.3% 59.4% 44.8% 56.4% 52.9% 54.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 3/3 0.7 2.3 68.7% 67.0% 35.3% 55.0% 28.2% 57.0% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 483/736 2.2 3.7 62.0% 66.4% 46.7% 54.1% 51.0% 58.9% 46.0% — 84/643 1.6 2.3 64.4% 64.1% 51.8% 56.1% 51.2% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vera Zvonareva Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 2000 1513 109.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.19 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 2002 1681 130.0 — — — — -116 +62 — 62.7% +0.87 3–6 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.60 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 2003 1849 149.5 +2.41 +2.44 1.198 53.8% -99 +67 -140 64.4% +1.28 13–13 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.83 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79
19 2004 1926 159.6 +2.15 +4.28 1.171 53.5% -42 +34 -139 63.7% +0.91 12–12 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.9 -1.01 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 2005 1682 124.3 +3.53 +1.85 1.223 53.6% +13 +211 +48 52.7% +0.41 4–7 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 93.2 +2.39 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 2006 1887 151.9 +1.25 +1.19 1.042 50.9% -32 -64 -5 60.0% +0.96 8–5 (62%) 7–4 (64%) 104.1 -4.89 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 2007 1938 159.4 +3.50 +2.92 1.164 53.1% -12 -46 — 64.9% +1.33 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.1 -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 2025 162.7 +5.37 +4.63 1.247 54.7% +3 -53 -198 69.5% +1.65 18–8 (69%) 10–12 (45%) 105.2 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1936 157.1 +4.96 +3.26 1.210 53.9% +35 — -104 70.2% +1.56 7–7 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 92.8 +0.96 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2010 2056 160.9 +5.32 +4.46 1.210 53.7% +6 -183 -117 69.6% +1.38 8–4 (67%) 6–0 (100%) 106.1 -1.28 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 2011 1948 159.2 +4.89 +4.16 1.175 53.2% +20 -77 -4 64.2% +1.06 19–7 (73%) 7–8 (47%) 103.4 +0.93 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36
27 2012 1848 114.1 +0.30 +0.09 1.003 50.1% +15 +5 +97 57.9% +0.24 4–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1773 110.5 -0.59 -1.20 0.861 46.7% +16 — +161 42.1% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1688 118.9 -1.94 +1.69 0.982 49.6% +7 — — 51.6% -0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1689 114.6 +3.30 +0.35 1.220 53.3% +1 — — 85.7% +2.43 1–0 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1708 125.4 -0.84 +1.40 0.988 49.5% +3 +98 — 36.7% -0.40 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1683 119.4 -0.92 -3.02 0.863 47.1% +48 +50 — 44.4% -0.37 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1734 131.1 +1.29 -1.13 0.967 49.4% +37 — — 43.5% -0.48 1–2 (33%) — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1765 134.8 -0.98 +0.91 0.984 49.7% -16 +67 +165 53.3% +0.22 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 97.6 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1720 126.8 -0.37 -0.35 0.927 48.4% -5 — — 36.0% -0.80 0–3 (0%) — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1688 120.5 -1.17 -1.18 0.877 47.7% -2 — — 31.8% -1.09 1–1 2–0 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1621 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1649 127.3 +0.98 -0.32 0.887 47.1% — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +3.01 +2.61 1.118 52.3% -8 +18 -32 61.5% +0.93 118–87 (58%) 76–72 (51%) 100.2 -0.48 — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.