H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 4-2

Vera Zvonareva holds a 4–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2005 Stanford round of 32 6-3 1-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
Russia Age 42 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #69 6-3 1-6 7-6(6) Vera Zvonareva #15 Match data Jul 28, 2005* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Vera Zvonareva #15 6-3 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #65 Match data Jul 21, 2005* R32 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Vera Zvonareva #11 7-6(3) 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #41 Match data Feb 20, 2005* F Memphis Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Vera Zvonareva #12 6-0 4-6 7-6(3) Meghann Shaughnessy #20 Match data Oct 16, 2003* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Meghann Shaughnessy #21 4-6 6-4 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #14 Match data Aug 31, 2003* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Vera Zvonareva #39 6-3 4-6 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #24 Match data Mar 5, 2003 R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vera Zvonareva #292 #2 7,935 2,089 466 270 63.3% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,848 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,926 0 2 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,681 0 3 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,886 0 5 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,938 0 5 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 2008 63–23 73.3% #7 2,024 0 7 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,936 0 9 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,055 0 10 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,948 0 12 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 2012 11–10 52.4% #95 1,847 0 12 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,772 0 12 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,688 0 12 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,689 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,707 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,682 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,733 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,764 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,719 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #292 1,648 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vera Zvonareva Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2000 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2003 19 14 33 57.6% 21 6 27 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 35 18 53 66.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 26 12 38 68.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2008 47 18 65 72.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2009 31 11 42 73.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2010 37 12 49 75.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2011 42 16 58 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2012 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2014 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 6 3 9 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320 185 505 63.4% 100 55 155 64.5% 38 23 61 62.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 483/704 of Vera Zvonareva's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vera Zvonareva Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 12/67 1.8 2.9 63.2% 66.5% 49.6% 59.9% 50.5% 59.9% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 13/81 3.2 5.2 55.1% 70.0% 43.0% 60.1% 47.6% 57.6% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 15/42 2.3 3.6 57.0% 70.3% 51.1% 58.3% 51.2% 61.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 38/59 2.6 2.7 59.3% 64.2% 45.7% 47.3% 49.2% 56.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 37/44 1.9 4.1 58.8% 67.9% 48.4% 51.5% 52.8% 59.8% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 67/86 2.2 3.9 60.8% 68.8% 48.8% 53.1% 56.3% 60.9% 48.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 43/48 2.1 4.0 62.9% 68.5% 46.8% 60.9% 52.8% 60.7% 47.6% 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 2010 62/67 2.2 3.1 65.1% 67.0% 48.5% 55.9% 50.3% 60.6% 47.7% 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 2011 67/76 3.0 4.1 60.6% 69.9% 45.2% 54.3% 50.4% 60.1% 46.9% 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 2012 17/21 1.8 4.5 63.3% 63.7% 45.6% 53.7% 57.2% 56.9% 43.2% 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 2014 8/8 2.8 4.3 63.3% 60.9% 41.6% 37.9% 26.3% 53.7% 39.9% 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 2015 15/15 2.2 4.7 62.9% 61.5% 44.9% 53.8% 49.2% 55.1% 44.1% 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
32 2017 4/4 0.5 2.5 67.7% 68.1% 52.8% 56.0% 49.5% 63.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 15/15 1.7 3.4 61.8% 58.9% 47.4% 51.4% 50.0% 54.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 13/13 1.6 4.3 65.3% 61.5% 43.8% 53.7% 46.1% 55.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 10/10 2.2 2.0 63.7% 64.2% 49.2% 59.5% 54.3% 58.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 21/22 1.8 3.4 67.1% 62.3% 41.4% 50.3% 50.8% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 11/11 1.4 3.5 66.6% 60.0% 48.4% 53.8% 45.5% 56.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 12/12 0.5 4.2 61.3% 59.4% 44.8% 56.4% 52.9% 54.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 3/3 0.7 2.3 68.7% 67.0% 35.3% 55.0% 28.2% 57.0% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 483/736 2.2 3.7 62.0% 66.4% 46.7% 54.1% 51.0% 58.9% 46.0% — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vera Zvonareva Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2000 1513 109.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1681 130.0 — — — — -116 +62 — 62.7% +0.87 3–6 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.60 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72
18 2003 1849 149.5 +2.41 +2.44 1.198 53.8% -99 +67 -140 64.4% +1.28 13–13 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.83 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03
19 2004 1926 159.6 +2.15 +4.28 1.171 53.5% -42 +34 -139 63.7% +0.91 12–12 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.9 -1.01 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65
20 2005 1682 124.3 +3.53 +1.85 1.223 53.6% +13 +211 +48 52.7% +0.41 4–7 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 93.2 +2.39 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27
21 2006 1887 151.9 +1.25 +1.19 1.042 50.9% -32 -64 -5 60.0% +0.96 8–5 (62%) 7–4 (64%) 104.1 -4.89 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56
22 2007 1938 159.4 +3.50 +2.92 1.164 53.1% -12 -46 — 64.9% +1.33 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.1 -1.53 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29
23 2008 2025 162.7 +5.37 +4.63 1.247 54.7% +3 -53 -198 69.5% +1.65 18–8 (69%) 10–12 (45%) 105.2 +0.64 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83
24 2009 1936 157.1 +4.96 +3.26 1.210 53.9% +35 — -104 70.2% +1.56 7–7 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 92.8 +0.96 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17
25 2010 2056 160.9 +5.32 +4.46 1.210 53.7% +6 -183 -117 69.6% +1.38 8–4 (67%) 6–0 (100%) 106.1 -1.28 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24
26 2011 1948 159.2 +4.89 +4.16 1.175 53.2% +20 -77 -4 64.2% +1.06 19–7 (73%) 7–8 (47%) 103.4 +0.93 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33
27 2012 1848 114.1 +0.30 +0.09 1.003 50.1% +15 +5 +97 57.9% +0.24 4–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.54 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26
29 2014 1773 110.5 -0.59 -1.20 0.861 46.7% +16 — +161 42.1% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.26 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09
30 2015 1688 118.9 -1.94 +1.69 0.982 49.6% +7 — — 51.6% -0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.5 -0.48 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71
32 2017 1689 114.6 +3.30 +0.35 1.220 53.3% +1 — — 85.7% +2.43 1–0 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1708 125.4 -0.84 +1.40 0.988 49.5% +3 +98 — 36.7% -0.40 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1683 119.4 -0.92 -3.02 0.863 47.1% +48 +50 — 44.4% -0.37 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1734 131.1 +1.29 -1.13 0.967 49.4% +37 — — 43.5% -0.48 1–2 (33%) — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1765 134.8 -0.98 +0.91 0.984 49.7% -16 +67 +165 53.3% +0.22 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 97.6 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1720 126.8 -0.37 -0.35 0.927 48.4% -5 — — 36.0% -0.80 0–3 (0%) — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1688 120.5 -1.17 -1.18 0.877 47.7% -2 — — 31.8% -1.09 1–1 2–0 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1621 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1649 127.3 +0.98 -0.32 0.887 47.1% — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +3.01 +2.61 1.118 52.3% -8 +18 -32 61.5% +0.93 118–87 (58%) 76–72 (51%) 100.2 -0.48 — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.