H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 4-2

Vera Zvonareva holds a 4–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2005 Stanford third round 6-3 1-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2005* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #69 6-3 1-6 7-6(6) Vera Zvonareva #15 Match data
Jul 21, 2005* Cincinnati WTA 500 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #15 6-3 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #65 Match data
Feb 20, 2005* Memphis WTA 500 F Hard Vera Zvonareva #11 7-6(3) 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #41 Match data
Oct 16, 2003* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #12 6-0 4-6 7-6(3) Meghann Shaughnessy #20 Match data
Aug 31, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #21 4-6 6-4 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #14 Match data
Mar 9, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #39 6-3 4-6 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —