H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 3-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–1 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–0 on clay, while Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Madrid second round 6-2 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 4, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Vera Zvonareva #3 6-2 1-6 6-2 Patty Schnyder #43 Match data
Oct 28, 2006* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Patty Schnyder #9 7-6(2) 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #26 Match data
Apr 9, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Vera Zvonareva #11 6-2 6-3 Patty Schnyder #17 Match data
Apr 10, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Vera Zvonareva #33 6-2 4-6 6-4 Patty Schnyder #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —