H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-7

Venus Williams holds a 7–1 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2010 Madrid third round 7-5 6-3.

RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 7
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Venus Williams #3 7-5 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #21 Match data
Nov 9, 2008* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals F Hard Venus Williams #8 6-7(5) 6-0 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #9 Match data
May 16, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Venus Williams #9 7-5 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #13 Match data
Mar 8, 2008* Bangalore WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #7 6-4 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #21 Match data
May 1, 2004* Warsaw WTA 500 SF Clay Venus Williams #13 6-3 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #11 Match data
Apr 17, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Venus Williams #16 6-3 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #11 Match data
Jul 2, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #4 6-1 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #17 Match data
Jun 3, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Vera Zvonareva #21 2-6 6-2 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47