H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Veronika Martinek vs Elena Makarova H2H: 1-0
Veronika Martinek holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Veronika Martinek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Veronika Martinek won the 1996 Amelia Island third round 7-5 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 54
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 53
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Veronika Martinek | 7-5 5-7 6-1 | Elena Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronika Martinek | #530 | #49 | 177 | 1,664 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Makarova | — | — | — | 1,755 | 59 | 72 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Veronika Martinek | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #160 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #61 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #143 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |