H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Veronika Martinek vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-1
Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Veronika Martinek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1991 Hilton Head second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 54
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1991* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-4 7-5 | Veronika Martinek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronika Martinek | #530 | #49 | 177 | 1,664 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Veronika Martinek | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #160 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #61 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #143 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |