H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-4
Andrea Temesvari holds a 4–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1985 Hilton Head third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1985* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-0 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1983* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 6-0 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Andrea Temesvari | 6-0 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| May 12, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-4 6-0 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |