Vicki Nelson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Amy Holton | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Andrea Temesvari | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 11, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 15, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 0-1
Claudia Porwik holds a 1–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1988 Australian Open round of 128 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | 6-4 6-2 | Vicki Nelson | Match data | Jan 13, 1988* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,677 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,786 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Vicki Nelson | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1987 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1983 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1988 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1985 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1986 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1991 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1987 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 1988 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 29 | 58 | 87 | 33.3% | 44 | 46 | 90 | 48.9% | 1 | 14 | 15 | 6.7% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | Career | 73 | 83 | 156 | 46.8% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 17 | 22 | 39 | 43.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Vicki Nelson | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1544 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 68.4% | +1.68 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.64 | 1986 | 1577 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +33 | — | 50.0% | -0.42 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.3 | +0.65 |
| 1981 | 1561 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +16 | +33 | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.19 | 1987 | 1582 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +32 | -42 | 44.7% | -0.46 | 4–8 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 97.8 | +1.43 |
| 1982 | 1616 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +10 | -70 | 44.4% | -0.22 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.7 | +0.60 | 1988 | 1572 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -30 | +14 | 41.4% | -0.72 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.4 | +0.38 |
| 1983 | 1539 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +36 | — | 36.0% | -0.92 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.9 | +0.43 | 1989 | 1661 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -72 | — | 52.9% | +0.09 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.4 | +0.85 |
| 1984 | 1538 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +128 | -55 | 45.8% | -0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.80 | 1990 | 1667 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–2 (71%) | 99.4 | +1.00 |
| 1985 | 1594 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +60 | — | 45.9% | -0.15 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | 95.2 | +1.52 | 1991 | 1645 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -98 | — | 42.7% | -0.60 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.4 | -1.33 |
| 1986 | 1590 | 109.0 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +125 | — | 39.5% | -0.83 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.2 | +2.92 | 1992 | 1606 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | -25 | 43.3% | -0.63 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.3 | +1.85 |
| 1987 | 1520 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +118 | — | 35.3% | -1.03 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.4 | +0.24 | 1993 | 1601 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -41 | +10 | 42.3% | -0.62 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.9 | -0.38 |
| 1988 | 1472 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | -77 | — | — | 9.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.24 | 1994 | 1585 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 |
| 1989 | 1461 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 | 1995 | 1551 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.07 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.2 | -0.10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1564 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.25 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.74 |
| Career | 1678 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +85 | -64 | 41.5% | -0.57 | 17–32 (35%) | 18–20 (47%) | 92.1 | +3.66 | Career | 1787 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -22 | -6 | 46.3% | -0.33 | 31–46 (40%) | 30–23 (57%) | 98.7 | +2.04 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Claudia Porwik
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 26, 1993 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 14, 1996 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Meredith Mcgrath | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 15, 1993 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 18, 1993 | H2H |