H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-3
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 3–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1987 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-2 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1983* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |