H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-1
Vicki Nelson and Laura Garrone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1986 Roland Garros second round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Laura Garrone | 6-3 7-6(3) | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| May 4, 1985* | Taranto | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 6-4 6-0 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |