Vicki Nelson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Amy Holton | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Andrea Temesvari | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 11, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 15, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 2–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1984 Roland Garros round of 64 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 6-2 | Vicki Nelson | Match data | May 31, 1984* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data | Apr 7, 1982* | R64 | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,677 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Vicki Nelson | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1982 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1983 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1983 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 1984 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 1985 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1986 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1987 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 1988 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 29 | 58 | 87 | 33.3% | 44 | 46 | 90 | 48.9% | 1 | 14 | 15 | 6.7% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | Career | 55 | 44 | 99 | 55.6% | 51 | 37 | 88 | 58.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 26 | 35 | 61 | 42.6% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Vicki Nelson | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1544 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 68.4% | +1.68 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.64 | 1981 | 1604 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.77 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.3 | +0.03 |
| 1981 | 1561 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +16 | +33 | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.19 | 1982 | 1768 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +66 | — | 61.1% | +0.97 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.6 | -1.22 |
| 1982 | 1616 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +10 | -70 | 44.4% | -0.22 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.7 | +0.60 | 1983 | 1885 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -143 | -283 | 55.0% | +0.38 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.1 | +1.89 |
| 1983 | 1539 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +36 | — | 36.0% | -0.92 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.9 | +0.43 | 1984 | 1865 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +31 | -235 | 60.9% | +0.95 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.1 | +1.70 |
| 1984 | 1538 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +128 | -55 | 45.8% | -0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.80 | 1985 | 1796 | 146.1 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +45 | -193 | 41.9% | -0.55 | 10–7 (59%) | 3–6 (33%) | 101.4 | -1.92 |
| 1985 | 1594 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +60 | — | 45.9% | -0.15 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | 95.2 | +1.52 | 1986 | 1733 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +70 | — | 54.5% | +0.16 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.8 | +0.52 |
| 1986 | 1590 | 109.0 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +125 | — | 39.5% | -0.83 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.2 | +2.92 | 1987 | 1704 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +55 | -107 | 48.2% | -0.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.88 |
| 1987 | 1520 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +118 | — | 35.3% | -1.03 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.4 | +0.24 | 1988 | 1634 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +65 | — | 34.8% | -0.85 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -1.54 |
| 1988 | 1472 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | -77 | — | — | 9.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.24 | 1989 | 1626 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.38 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 1989 | 1461 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 | 1990 | 1621 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1638 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 1678 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +85 | -64 | 41.5% | -0.57 | 17–32 (35%) | 18–20 (47%) | 92.1 | +3.66 | Career | 1928 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +15 | -216 | 52.6% | +0.24 | 41–40 (51%) | 21–24 (47%) | 99.3 | -0.48 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Amy Holton | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Andrea Temesvari | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 11, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Laura Arraya | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 23, 1985 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 9, 1988 | H2H |
| Michelle Torres | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 18, 1986 | H2H |