Vicki Nelson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Amy Holton | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Andrea Temesvari | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 11, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 15, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1987 Oklahoma round of 32 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | 7-5 7-5 | Vicki Nelson | Match data | Feb 12, 1987* | R32 | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | — | #60 | 8 | 1,678 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nathalie Herreman | — | #42 | 20 | 1,727 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Vicki Nelson | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1983 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1984 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1984 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1985 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1986 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 1986 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1987 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1988 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 29 | 58 | 87 | 33.3% | 44 | 46 | 90 | 48.9% | 1 | 14 | 15 | 6.7% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | Career | 41 | 59 | 100 | 41.0% | 34 | 55 | 89 | 38.2% | 8 | 16 | 24 | 33.3% | 20 | 24 | 44 | 45.5% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Vicki Nelson | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1544 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 68.4% | +1.68 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.69 | 1982 | 1492 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1981 | 1561 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +33 | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.17 | 1983 | 1548 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +62 | — | 50.0% | -0.31 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.64 |
| 1982 | 1616 | 115.5 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +11 | -69 | 44.4% | -0.22 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.8 | +0.47 | 1984 | 1564 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +37 | — | 41.9% | -0.81 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.3 | +1.08 |
| 1983 | 1539 | 113.5 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +36 | — | 36.0% | -0.92 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.9 | +0.41 | 1985 | 1543 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | -27 | — | 40.0% | -1.30 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.90 |
| 1984 | 1538 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +129 | -54 | 45.8% | -0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.68 | 1986 | 1718 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | -77 | -13 | — | 62.1% | +0.93 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.4 | +1.25 |
| 1985 | 1595 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +60 | — | 45.9% | -0.15 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | 95.3 | +1.56 | 1987 | 1641 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -7 | — | 40.8% | -0.90 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–2 (71%) | 95.4 | +0.79 |
| 1986 | 1591 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +124 | — | 39.5% | -0.83 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.2 | +2.63 | 1988 | 1606 | 116.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -62 | -62 | 46.2% | -0.48 | 4–8 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.86 |
| 1987 | 1521 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +117 | — | 35.3% | -1.03 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.4 | +0.16 | 1989 | 1569 | 127.3 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -64 | — | 36.4% | -0.73 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–6 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.34 |
| 1988 | 1472 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | -76 | — | — | 9.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.24 | 1990 | 1683 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -156 | -113 | 48.3% | -0.24 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.4 | -1.70 |
| 1989 | 1462 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 | 1991 | 1618 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -109 | -30 | 38.7% | -0.83 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -0.07 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1556 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +62 | -82 | — | 34.7% | -1.06 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1623 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -99 | — | 41.2% | -1.18 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.45 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1585 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -41 | — | 21.4% | -3.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.34 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1581 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.22 |
| Career | 1678 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +84 | -63 | 41.5% | -0.57 | 17–32 (35%) | 18–20 (47%) | 92.1 | +3.40 | Career | 1727 | 129.1 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -46 | -75 | 42.9% | -0.64 | 24–42 (36%) | 16–19 (46%) | 93.0 | +0.82 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Amy Holton | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Andrea Temesvari | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 11, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 4, 1993 | H2H |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 5, 1993 | H2H |