H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-3
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 3–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1985 Indianapolis US Clay third round 6-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1985* | Indianapolis US Clay | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-7 6-3 6-3 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| May 5, 1985* | Taranto | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 6-4 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1983* | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-5 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |