H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 3-0
Vicki Nelson holds a 3–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vicki Nelson leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vicki Nelson won the 1987 Tampa third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1987* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 6-1 6-3 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1987* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 6-2 6-0 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1986* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vicki Nelson | 7-6 7-6 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |