H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2014 Tokyo third round 3-6 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 18, 2014* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #25 3-6 6-0 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 15, 2010* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #7 6-1 5-7 7-5 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 — — — — — — —
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 — — — — — — —
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 — — — — — — —
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 — — — — — — —
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 — — — — — — —
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8