H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 4-1

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–1 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2012 Tokyo third round 6-1 6-1.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 27, 2012* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-1 6-1 Tamira Paszek Match data
Aug 9, 2012* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Tamira Paszek 3-3 (ret.) Victoria Azarenka #1 Match data
Jul 6, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Victoria Azarenka #2 6-3 7-6(4) Tamira Paszek Match data
Jul 1, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Victoria Azarenka #5 6-3 6-1 Tamira Paszek Match data
Aug 2, 2008* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #16 6-4 7-5 Tamira Paszek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Tamira Paszek 1,801 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 1–1 50.0% 1,512 0 0
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 2006 6–2 75.0% 1,598 0 1
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2007 15–14 51.7% 1,730 0 1
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% 1,697 0 1
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% 1,626 0 1
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2010 9–9 50.0% 1,641 0 2
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2011 19–21 47.5% 1,664 0 2
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2012 18–20 47.4% 1,687 0 3
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2013 2–17 10.5% 1,483 0 3
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2014 1–4 20.0% 1,475 0 3
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2015 1–4 20.0% 1,447 0 3
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2016 6–9 40.0% 1,498 0 3
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21