H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Viktoriya Kutuzova vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 1-0
Viktoriya Kutuzova holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktoriya Kutuzova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktoriya Kutuzova won the 2005 Indian Wells first round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Viktoriya Kutuzova | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Kutuzova | #824 | #76 | 804 | 1,618 | 21 | 41 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #485 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #87 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #447 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |