H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Viktoriya Kutuzova vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 0-1
Samantha Reeves holds a 1–0 lead over Viktoriya Kutuzova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Reeves leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Reeves won the 2004 Indian Wells first round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Samantha Reeves | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Kutuzova | #824 | #76 | 804 | 1,618 | 21 | 41 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samantha Reeves | #864 | #62 | 523 | 1,629 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #485 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #111 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #87 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #447 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |