H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 0-6

Amanda Coetzer holds a 6–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 6–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2002 Acapulco fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 1, 2002* Acapulco WTA 250 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #17 6-2 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #63 Match data
May 31, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amanda Coetzer #13 6-4 7-5 Virginia Ruano Pascual #93 Match data
Apr 29, 1999* Hamburg WTA 250 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #16 6-3 7-6 Virginia Ruano Pascual #33 Match data
Apr 9, 1999* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #13 6-1 7-5 Virginia Ruano Pascual #31 Match data
Apr 3, 1998* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #4 6-0 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #49 Match data
Apr 7, 1995* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #19 7-5 7-5 Virginia Ruano Pascual #130 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —