H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 1-0

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 1–0 lead over Amelie Cocheteux in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 1997 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Amelie Cocheteux
FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #65 6-4 6-2 Amelie Cocheteux #235 Match data May 29, 1997* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Amelie Cocheteux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0
22 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Amelie Cocheteux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Amelie Cocheteux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24 1995 1490 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
18 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36 1996 1468 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.18
19 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39 1997 1492 108.2 — — — — — +57 — 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.11
20 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 1998 1530 115.1 — — — — +15 +34 — 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42
21 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72 1999 1565 110.5 — — — — +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17
22 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54 2000 1463 103.9 — — — — +81 -6 — 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44
23 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29 — 1583 110.6 — — — — +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.