H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Angeles Montolio H2H: 2-2

Virginia Ruano Pascual and Angeles Montolio are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–1 on clay, while Angeles Montolio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2002 Rome second round 7-6(4) 6-3.

ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 15, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #78 7-6(4) 6-3 Angeles Montolio #50 Match data
Mar 9, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Angeles Montolio #49 7-5 3-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #76 Match data
May 28, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #65 6-0 6-0 Angeles Montolio #151 Match data
Jul 28, 1995* Styria WTA 250 R16 Clay Angeles Montolio #186 6-2 1-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Angeles Montolio #601 #22 1,109 1,818 86 94 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Angeles Montolio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0 1994 2–7 22.2% #103 1,489 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1995 3–4 42.9% #172 1,523 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0 1996 4–9 30.8% #110 1,530 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #260 1,515 0 0
22 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1 1999 9–8 52.9% #60 1,592 0 0
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2 2000 22–20 52.4% #55 1,655 0 0
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2 2001 36–22 62.1% #23 1,729 0 2
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2 2002 9–20 31.0% #134 1,519 0 3
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3