H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 1-0

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 1993 Kitzbuhel round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #136 6-1 6-4 Barbara Rittner #29 Match data Jul 16, 1993* R16 Kitzbuhel Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,896 211 218 49.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1992 25–16 61.0% #29 1,850 0 1
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,843 0 1
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,819 0 1
22 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,729 0 1
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,727 0 1
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,652 0 1
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,663 0 1
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,654 0 1
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,631 0 2
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,567 0 2
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,570 0 2
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Barbara Rittner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 11 8 19 57.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 6 10 16 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 83 93 176 47.2% 73 74 147 49.7% 18 19 37 48.6% 37 32 69 53.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's and 5/23 of Barbara Rittner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Barbara Rittner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0% 2003 3/20 0.3 2.0 64.8% 54.6% 41.8% 54.9% 22.5% 49.8% 30.7%
31 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7% 2004 2/3 1.5 4.0 61.6% 49.7% 42.0% 49.4% 92.9% 47.2% 52.3%
32 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1% — 5/429 0.8 2.8 63.5% 52.6% 41.9% 52.7% 50.6% 48.8% 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Barbara Rittner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24 1990 1557 121.6 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–0 — -0.40
18 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36 1991 1709 130.4 — — — — +4 -111 — 52.9% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 106.0 +1.01
19 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39 1992 1850 151.2 — — — — -12 -152 -246 57.8% +0.43 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 103.8 -1.88
20 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 1993 1844 151.4 — — — — +11 -88 — 60.9% +0.72 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 -1.04
21 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72 1994 1820 146.5 — — — — +35 -80 -177 58.9% +0.85 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -1.12
22 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54 1995 1729 138.0 — — — — +52 -26 — 53.9% +0.47 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 96.7 -0.26
23 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26 1996 1728 144.8 — — — — +59 -24 — 46.7% -0.05 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -1.28
24 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47 1997 1653 135.9 — — — — +28 +52 -38 42.9% -0.07 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -1.13
25 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 1998 1664 132.7 — — — — -29 +97 — 48.4% +0.21 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.20
26 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51 1999 1655 126.4 — — — — +7 +43 -46 45.8% -0.24 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.69
27 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34 2000 1661 124.8 — — — — +33 -20 -41 48.1% 0.00 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.8 -0.48
28 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57 2001 1619 127.0 — — — — +17 +56 +14 50.6% +0.30 5–8 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 97.9 -0.24
29 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46 2002 1632 131.4 — — — — 0 +51 -45 44.7% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -0.85
30 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60 2003 1568 107.0 -0.66 -2.21 0.611 40.9% -12 +39 +86 35.4% -1.04 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -0.85
31 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27 2004 1571 109.3 -1.05 +2.64 0.990 49.4% — +36 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.31
32 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29 — 1897 144.7 -0.82 -0.27 0.767 44.3% +16 -11 -47 50.7% +0.17 61–74 (45%) 39–39 (50%) 96.9 -2.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.