H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-1
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Hamburg fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1996* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 |