H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Janette Husarova H2H: 1-1

Virginia Ruano Pascual and Janette Husarova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janette Husarova leads 1–0 on clay, while Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2003 Australian Open round of 64 5-7 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Janette Husarova
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #63 5-7 7-5 6-0 Janette Husarova #31 Match data Jan 17, 2003* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Janette Husarova #113 6-4 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #87 Match data Sep 20, 1996* R16 Warsaw Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Janette Husarova #1,055 #31 1,006 1,737 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Janette Husarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1993 3–1 75.0% #82 1,547 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0 1994 6–13 31.6% #145 1,508 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1995 1–5 16.7% #102 1,477 0 0
22 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0 1996 12–14 46.2% #76 1,544 0 0
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1 1997 1–2 33.3% #375 1,541 0 0
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2 1998 5–9 35.7% #127 1,524 0 0
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2 1999 0–3 0.0% #216 1,502 0 0
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2 2000 3–5 37.5% #149 1,489 0 0
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 2001 10–15 40.0% #72 1,526 0 0
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2 2002 28–24 53.8% #33 1,716 0 0
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 2003 7–16 30.4% #126 1,578 0 0
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3 2004 1–1 50.0% #205 1,589 0 0
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3 2005 2–1 66.7% #366 1,604 0 0
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Janette Husarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 4 5 9 44.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 17 15 32 53.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 3 9 12 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 39 53 92 42.4% 30 42 72 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's and 3/23 of Janette Husarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Janette Husarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7% 2003 3/23 1.0 4.3 58.0% 53.8% 38.3% 54.2% 60.2% 47.4% 39.7%
30 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1% — 3/188 1.0 4.3 58.0% 53.8% 38.3% 54.2% 60.2% 47.4% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Janette Husarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39 1993 1547 100.6 — — — — +34 — — 75.0% +0.38 — 1–0 — +0.39
20 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 1994 1508 103.9 — — — — +39 +46 — 32.6% -1.23 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 98.6 +1.20
21 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72 1995 1477 101.2 — — — — +49 — — 23.1% -1.92 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
22 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54 1996 1545 112.8 — — — — -4 +37 — 51.7% -0.07 2–6 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.72
23 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26 1997 1542 102.2 — — — — -3 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — -0.04
24 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47 1998 1525 112.1 — — — — +6 +37 — 36.4% -1.00 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 +0.35
25 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 1999 1502 104.4 — — — — — +26 — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.55
26 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51 2000 1490 103.1 — — — — +10 +53 — 42.9% -0.57 2–3 (40%) — — +0.68
27 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34 2001 1527 118.7 — — — — +9 +8 — 42.9% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 +0.95
28 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57 2002 1717 138.8 — — — — -46 -61 — 53.0% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 107.9 -2.46
29 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46 2003 1579 119.5 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% +16 +25 — 37.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.52
30 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60 2004 1590 109.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.11
31 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27 2005 1605 111.1 — — — — +9 — — 100.0% +4.25 — — — +0.07
32 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29 — 1737 124.3 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% -4 +11 — 44.9% -0.45 25–32 (44%) 15–16 (48%) 100.2 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.