H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 0-2

Kristie Boogert holds a 2–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristie Boogert leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 5-7 6-4 6-2.

ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kristie Boogert #51 5-7 6-4 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #115 Match data
Jun 28, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kristie Boogert #58 6-4 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3