H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-2
Martina Hingis holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on clay, while Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 6-4 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2001* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-1 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| May 9, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-1 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |