H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Rita Grande H2H: 3-1
Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 3–1 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 1999 Key Biscayne second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 6-4 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1999* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Rita Grande | 6-2 5-1 (ret.) | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| May 18, 1997* | Cardiff | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| May 8, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 6-4 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |