H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 1-1

Virginia Ruano Pascual and Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay, while Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 1997 Australian Open round of 64 7-6(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
ROU Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 7-6(3) 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #103 Match data Jan 17, 1997* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Virginia Ruano Pascual #88 2-6 6-0 6-3 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Jun 6, 1995* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,960 186 182 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 0
22 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,663 0 0
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1 1996 31–16 66.0% — 1,845 0 3
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,831 0 4
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 2000 20–25 44.4% — 1,671 0 4
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,542 0 4
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,510 0 4
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,504 0 4
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 7 6 13 53.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
26 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1999 12 10 22 54.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 7 12 19 36.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
28 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 62 75 137 45.3% 95 64 159 59.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 10 27 37 27.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's and 1/4 of Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7% 2004 1/4 2.0 5.0 60.0% 55.6% 29.2% 54.5% 33.3% 45.0% 37.0%
32 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1% — 1/368 2.0 5.0 60.0% 55.6% 29.2% 54.5% 33.3% 45.0% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 1993 1584 120.7 — — — — -73 +68 +30 45.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +0.86
21 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72 1994 1590 113.2 — — — — -94 +83 — 44.1% -0.53 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.7 +0.90
22 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54 1995 1663 135.9 — — — — -137 +102 — 51.9% +0.39 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 +0.99
23 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26 1996 1846 133.4 — — — — -211 +41 -120 59.3% +0.43 16–5 (76%) 9–2 (82%) 115.9 +0.11
24 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47 1997 1778 145.5 — — — — -116 +159 +33 55.0% +0.30 15–10 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 +0.55
25 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 1998 1696 144.6 — — — — -43 +199 — 46.9% -0.16 4–10 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 96.4 -0.86
26 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51 1999 1832 151.2 — — — — -61 +71 -133 55.6% +0.52 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.42
27 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34 2000 1672 134.5 — — — — -57 +196 +97 48.1% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 97.6 -1.14
28 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57 2001 1543 113.9 — — — — +72 +132 +197 37.3% -0.58 3–6 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 91.5 +0.37
29 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60 2003 1511 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
31 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27 2004 1505 112.3 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% +91 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.20
32 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29 — 1960 141.7 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% -80 +118 +9 50.4% +0.05 64–61 (51%) 38–33 (54%) 105.1 +0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.