H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 0-3
Sandrine Testud holds a 3–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2001 Toronto second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sandrine Testud | 6-1 6-1 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |