H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-1

Virginia Ruano Pascual and Silvija Talaja are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay, while Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2002 Japan Open fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2002* Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Silvija Talaja #95 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #66 Match data
Jul 12, 2002* Brussels WTA 250 R16 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #85 6-2 6-1 Silvija Talaja #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —