H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Miami first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #54 6-1 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #86 Match data
Apr 4, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R32 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #72 6-1 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #22 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #45 3-6 6-3 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4