H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 1-1

Virginia Ruzici and Camille Benjamin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on clay, while Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1984 Mahwah round of 64 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin #31 6-0 6-3 Virginia Ruzici #24 Match data Aug 15, 1984* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Ruzici #16 6-4 3-6 7-6 Camille Benjamin #41 Match data Apr 12, 1984* R32 Hilton Head Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19
Camille Benjamin #1,000 #27 13 1,820 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,628 0 0
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0
26 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17 1993 1–3 25.0% #276 1,516 0 0
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18 — — — — — — —
30 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19 — — — — — — —
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruzici Camille Benjamin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6% 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3% — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruzici Camille Benjamin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1690 123.4 — — — — +57 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 +0.11
17 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 1983 1715 124.3 — — — — -16 -37 -116 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.37
18 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98 1984 1767 138.8 — — — — -53 -4 -96 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.27
19 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04 1985 1629 116.8 — — — — +24 +2 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.47
20 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38 1986 1608 118.6 — — — — -3 +36 +20 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.65
21 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76 1987 1654 128.3 — — — — -3 -8 +7 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 +0.06
22 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12 1988 1600 120.9 — — — — -4 +28 +19 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.02
23 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09 1989 1652 128.9 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.55
24 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55
25 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80 1991 1559 107.1 — — — — -30 +86 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
26 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70 1992 1527 113.1 — — — — -18 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
27 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11 1993 1516 101.5 — — — — -9 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04
28 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86 — 1821 128.3 — — — — -1 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.