H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 0-1

Helen Kelesi holds a 1–0 lead over Virginia Ruzici in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1985 Monticello quarterfinal 1-6 6-2 6-4.

ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
CAN Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helen Kelesi 1-6 6-2 6-4 Virginia Ruzici Match data Aug 24, 1985* QF Monticello WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruzici — #16 5 2,125 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 0 18 19
Helen Kelesi — #13 54 1,954 213 165 56.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Helen Kelesi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 15–15 50.0% #48 1,642 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 28–21 57.1% #39 1,745 0 1
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1987 22–19 53.7% #32 1,785 0 1
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0 1988 33–19 63.5% #19 1,815 0 2
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2 1989 36–18 66.7% #13 1,872 0 2
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3 1990 23–17 57.5% #25 1,785 0 2
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3 1991 26–20 56.5% #29 1,715 0 2
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,921 0 4 1992 7–13 35.0% #128 1,632 0 2
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,093 1 8 1993 18–13 58.1% #48 1,756 0 2
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,976 1 8 1994 5–10 33.3% #125 1,647 0 2
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,032 1 12 — — — — — — —
26 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,921 1 13 — — — — — — —
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,985 1 17 — — — — — — —
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,906 1 18 — — — — — — —
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,781 1 18 — — — — — — —
30 1985 27–19 58.7% — 1,786 1 19 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,735 1 19 — — — — — — —
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,658 1 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruzici Helen Kelesi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 11 7 18 61.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 11 10 21 52.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 20 9 29 69.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 7 8 15 46.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 8 8 16 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5% 1994 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3% — 98 77 175 56.0% 88 50 138 63.8% 9 15 24 37.5% 18 23 41 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruzici Helen Kelesi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1642 120.7 — — — — +5 -36 — 48.0% -0.51 9–6 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 106.9 +0.83
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1745 135.5 — — — — -29 -31 -159 54.6% +0.16 12–9 (57%) 10–8 (56%) 106.9 +0.59
17 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 1987 1786 144.3 — — — — -40 +12 -186 53.5% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 100.3 -2.78
18 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +1.11 1988 1815 148.0 — — — — -89 +155 — 62.1% +0.90 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 96.5 -0.44
19 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +0.45 1989 1872 151.2 — — — — -32 +146 — 64.5% +0.83 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 105.2 -1.47
20 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21 1990 1785 139.7 — — — — -66 +217 — 60.0% +0.68 4–8 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +0.69
21 1976 1798 142.1 — — — — -256 +110 -320 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -2.30 1991 1716 141.5 — — — — -36 +257 -140 54.7% +0.47 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 98.7 +0.82
22 1977 1921 148.4 — — — — -144 +42 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.19 1992 1633 124.6 — — — — -3 — — 46.3% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.8 -0.03
23 1978 2093 158.9 — — — — -38 -56 -464 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -8.28 1993 1756 136.5 — — — — -2 +91 -126 57.6% +0.51 6–2 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 107.2 -1.21
24 1979 1976 151.5 — — — — +51 +40 -194 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -2.80 1994 1647 125.6 — — — — +73 +114 — 38.7% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.09
25 1980 2032 158.1 — — — — +33 +161 -225 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 -6.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1921 159.2 — — — — -20 +290 -69 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -7.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1985 156.7 — — — — -60 +261 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1906 143.9 — — — — +20 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1781 144.4 — — — — -45 +179 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1787 140.6 — — — — -88 +215 +67 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2125 154.9 — — — — -27 +141 -198 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -4.25 — 1955 146.4 — — — — -29 +126 -160 56.1% +0.37 67–61 (52%) 46–39 (54%) 104.4 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.