H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-0

Virginia Ruzici holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1984 Marco Island quarterfinal 6-2 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici #21 6-2 2-6 6-1 Laura Arraya #48 Match data Jan 28, 1984* QF Marco Island WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Ruzici 6-4 6-2 Laura Arraya Match data Apr 8, 1983* R16 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,125 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 0 18 19
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,921 0 4 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,093 1 8 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,976 1 8 — — — — — — —
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,032 1 12 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,921 1 13 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,985 1 17 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,906 1 18 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,781 1 18 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,735 1 19 — — — — — — —
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,658 1 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruzici Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruzici Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 1981 1686 129.2 — — — — -72 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.28
18 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +1.11 1982 1742 127.0 — — — — -62 -26 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.31
19 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +0.45 1983 1713 125.8 — — — — +7 +31 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.82
20 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21 1984 1760 130.7 — — — — -102 +142 -131 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.87
21 1976 1798 142.1 — — — — -256 +110 -320 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -2.30 1985 1692 125.0 — — — — -1 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.85
22 1977 1921 148.4 — — — — -144 +42 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.19 1986 1719 138.2 — — — — -26 +99 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -2.33
23 1978 2093 158.9 — — — — -38 -56 -464 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -8.28 1987 1771 133.6 — — — — -31 -12 -185 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.61
24 1979 1976 151.5 — — — — +51 +40 -194 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -2.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2032 158.1 — — — — +33 +161 -225 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 -6.12 1989 1883 136.9 — — — — -7 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 -0.64
26 1981 1921 159.2 — — — — -20 +290 -69 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -7.10 1990 1821 142.0 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 1982 1985 156.7 — — — — -60 +261 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.30 1991 1824 132.7 — — — — +12 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 1983 1906 143.9 — — — — +20 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.52 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 1984 1781 144.4 — — — — -45 +179 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.86 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1985 1787 140.6 — — — — -88 +215 +67 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2125 154.9 — — — — -27 +141 -198 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -4.25 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.