H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 2-1

Virginia Ruzici holds a 2–1 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1982 Tampa round of 32 6-2 7-6.

ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici 6-2 7-6 Lea Antonoplis Match data Oct 14, 1982* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Lea Antonoplis 6-3 6-4 Virginia Ruzici Match data Dec 4, 1981* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Virginia Ruzici 6-0 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Feb 22, 1980* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruzici — #16 5 2,125 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 0 18 19
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,921 0 4 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,093 1 8 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,976 1 8 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,032 1 12 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,921 1 13 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,985 1 17 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,906 1 18 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,781 1 18 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 1985 27–19 58.7% — 1,786 1 19 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,735 1 19 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,658 1 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruzici Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruzici Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +1.11 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +0.45 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 1976 1798 142.1 — — — — -256 +110 -320 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -2.30 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1977 1921 148.4 — — — — -144 +42 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.19 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1978 2093 158.9 — — — — -38 -56 -464 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -8.28 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1979 1976 151.5 — — — — +51 +40 -194 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -2.80 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 1980 2032 158.1 — — — — +33 +161 -225 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 -6.12 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 1981 1921 159.2 — — — — -20 +290 -69 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -7.10 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 1982 1985 156.7 — — — — -60 +261 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.30 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 1983 1906 143.9 — — — — +20 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.52 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 1984 1781 144.4 — — — — -45 +179 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.86 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 1985 1787 140.6 — — — — -88 +215 +67 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.06 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.42 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
32 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2125 154.9 — — — — -27 +141 -198 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -4.25 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.