H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Lilian Drescher H2H: 0-2

Lilian Drescher holds a 2–0 lead over Virginia Ruzici in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lilian Drescher leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilian Drescher won the 1985 Birmingham round of 32 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lilian Drescher
SUI Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilian Drescher 3-1 (ret.) Virginia Ruzici Match data Jun 13, 1985* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Lilian Drescher 6-2 6-4 Virginia Ruzici #48 Match data Feb 8, 1985* R32 Delray Beach Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19
Lilian Drescher — — — 1,716 63 71 47.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Lilian Drescher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–6 33.3% — 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 6–6 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1982 10–3 76.9% — 1,637 0 2
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0 1983 3–8 27.3% — 1,585 0 2
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2 1984 12–12 50.0% — 1,628 0 3
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3 1985 18–16 52.9% — 1,686 0 3
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3 1986 10–15 40.0% — 1,621 0 3
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4 1987 1–5 16.7% — 1,567 0 3
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8 — — — — — — —
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8 — — — — — — —
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12 — — — — — — —
26 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13 — — — — — — —
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17 — — — — — — —
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18 — — — — — — —
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18 — — — — — — —
30 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19 — — — — — — —
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruzici Lilian Drescher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
22 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3% — 25 23 48 52.1% 28 27 55 50.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruzici Lilian Drescher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1496 106.2 — — — — — +1 — 35.0% -0.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.42
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1500 100.8 — — — — — +58 — 52.0% +0.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +1.10
17 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 1982 1638 120.6 — — — — — +80 — 66.7% +0.97 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.91
18 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98 1983 1586 108.1 — — — — -3 — -43 33.3% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.36
19 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04 1984 1629 119.3 — — — — +25 +99 -69 50.9% -0.09 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.9 +1.35
20 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38 1985 1687 130.4 — — — — +55 -51 -120 56.2% +0.60 0–9 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 92.4 +1.28
21 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76 1986 1621 114.8 — — — — +30 +34 — 42.6% -0.76 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 +1.37
22 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12 1987 1568 99.3 — — — — +35 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.14
23 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86 — 1716 121.5 — — — — +33 +35 -84 48.8% -0.12 12–21 (36%) 13–8 (62%) 99.5 +4.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.