H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Maria Teresa Nasuelli H2H: 2-0
Virginia Ruzici holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Teresa Nasuelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1976 Barcelona fourth round 8-10 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1976* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 8-10 7-5 6-1 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1975* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-2 6-4 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Maria Teresa Nasuelli | — | — | — | 1,622 | 66 | 98 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Virginia Ruzici | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |