H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-2
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruzici in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1984 East Hanover third round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1984* | East Hanover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1982* | Kansas City | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1981* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Virginia Ruzici | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |