H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 2-2

Virginia Ruzici and Rosalyn Fairbank are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–0 on carpet, while Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1985 Dallas third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 1985* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank #42 6-3 7-5 Virginia Ruzici #48 Match data
Jun 27, 1984* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Virginia Ruzici #22 6-1 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #36 Match data
Feb 6, 1982* Detroit WTA 250 QF Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank 2-6 6-4 6-0 Virginia Ruzici Match data
Nov 30, 1979* Melbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Virginia Ruzici 7-5 4-6 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,121 458 274 62.6% 1 0 0 1 18 20
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,494 0 0 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,651 0 2 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,687 0 3 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,796 0 3 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,918 0 4 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,093 1 8 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,966 1 8 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,027 1 12 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1981 61–30 67.0% — 1,920 1 14 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,982 1 18 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 19 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 19 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 20 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 20 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,658 1 20 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1