H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-0
Virginia Ruzici holds a 1–0 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1982 Nassau semifinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1982* | Nassau | WTA 250 | SF | — | Virginia Ruzici | 6-1 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruzici | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |