H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 3-0
Virginia Wade holds a 3–0 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1979 Minneapolis fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1979* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-2 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1979* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-3 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1969* | Chestnut Hill | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-0 6-2 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Virginia Wade | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |