H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginia Wade vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-1

Virginia Wade and Claudia Kohde Kilsch are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Amelia Island second round 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Wade
GBR Age 81 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 1982* Amelia Island WTA 250 R64 Clay Claudia Kohde Kilsch 7-6 6-4 Virginia Wade Match data
Feb 14, 1981* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Virginia Wade 6-2 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Wade #138 #40 — 2,313 865 314 73.4% 3 2 0 2 51 58
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Wade Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 — — — — — — — 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 — — — — — — — 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 — — — — — — — 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 — — — — — — — 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1968 85–19 81.7% — 1,945 1 9 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1969 82–18 82.0% — 2,118 1 16 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1970 69–22 75.8% — 2,080 1 21 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1971 64–16 80.0% — 2,161 1 29 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1972 75–23 76.5% — 2,151 2 34 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1973 63–16 79.7% — 2,158 2 40 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1974 60–16 78.9% — 2,189 2 45 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 1975 65–14 82.3% — 2,313 2 51 — — — — — — —
30 1976 48–17 73.8% — 2,256 2 53 — — — — — — —
31 1977 50–18 73.5% — 2,274 3 55 — — — — — — —
32 1978 69–25 73.4% — 2,240 3 58 — — — — — — —
33 1979 51–26 66.2% — 2,088 3 58 — — — — — — —
34 1980 30–21 58.8% — 1,885 3 58 — — — — — — —
35 1981 25–21 54.3% — 1,824 3 58 — — — — — — —
36 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,749 3 58 — — — — — — —
37 1983 10–9 52.6% — 1,788 3 58 — — — — — — —
38 1984 6–11 35.3% #61 1,728 3 58 — — — — — — —
39 1985 7–9 43.8% #62 1,712 3 58 — — — — — — —