H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Virginia Wade vs Kate Latham H2H: 5-0

Virginia Wade holds a 5–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1982 Lugano second round 0-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Wade
GBR Age 81 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Kate Latham
Age 73

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 1982* Lugano WTA 250 R64 Clay Virginia Wade 0-6 7-5 6-3 Kate Latham Match data
Jan 23, 1981* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Virginia Wade 6-2 4-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data
Feb 18, 1977* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Virginia Wade 6-2 6-3 Kate Latham Match data
Aug 30, 1975* US Open Grand Slam R64 Clay Virginia Wade 6-1 6-1 Kate Latham Match data
Aug 22, 1974* Newport WTA 250 R16 Grass Virginia Wade 7-5 6-1 Kate Latham Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Wade #138 #40 — 2,313 865 314 73.4% 3 2 0 2 51 58
Kate Latham — — — 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Wade Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,476 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,844 0 3
22 1968 85–19 81.7% — 1,945 1 9 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,690 0 3
23 1969 82–18 82.0% — 2,118 1 16 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,680 0 3
24 1970 69–22 75.8% — 2,080 1 21 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,755 0 3
25 1971 64–16 80.0% — 2,161 1 29 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,661 0 3
26 1972 75–23 76.5% — 2,151 2 34 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,848 0 3
27 1973 63–16 79.7% — 2,158 2 40 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1974 60–16 78.9% — 2,189 2 45 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1975 65–14 82.3% — 2,313 2 51 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,688 0 5
30 1976 48–17 73.8% — 2,256 2 53 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 6
31 1977 50–18 73.5% — 2,274 3 55 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,494 0 6
32 1978 69–25 73.4% — 2,240 3 58 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,528 0 6
33 1979 51–26 66.2% — 2,088 3 58 — — — — — — —
34 1980 30–21 58.8% — 1,885 3 58 — — — — — — —
35 1981 25–21 54.3% — 1,824 3 58 — — — — — — —
36 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,749 3 58 — — — — — — —
37 1983 10–9 52.6% — 1,788 3 58 — — — — — — —
38 1984 6–11 35.3% #61 1,728 3 58 — — — — — — —
39 1985 7–9 43.8% #62 1,712 3 58 — — — — — — —