H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Virginia Wade vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 3-0

Virginia Wade holds a 3–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1985 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Wade
GBR Age 81 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Wade 6-4 7-5 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jun 26, 1985* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Nov 23, 1979* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Wade 6-2 7-6 Lea Antonoplis Match data Mar 1, 1979* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Wade — #2 — 2,325 865 314 73.4% 3 0 0 2 48 53
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Wade Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1968 85–19 81.7% — 1,940 1 4 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1969 82–18 82.0% — 2,122 1 11 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1970 69–22 75.8% — 2,090 1 16 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1971 63–14 81.8% — 2,177 1 24 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1972 76–24 76.0% — 2,145 2 29 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 1973 63–16 79.7% — 2,163 2 35 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 1974 60–17 77.9% — 2,198 2 40 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1975 65–14 82.3% #2 2,323 2 46 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 1976 48–17 73.8% #3 2,285 2 48 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 1977 50–18 73.5% #4 2,279 3 50 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2
32 1978 69–25 73.4% #4 2,254 3 53 — — — — — — —
33 1979 51–26 66.2% #8 2,071 3 53 — — — — — — —
34 1980 30–21 58.8% — 1,875 3 53 — — — — — — —
35 1981 25–21 54.3% — 1,822 3 53 — — — — — — —
36 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,747 3 53 — — — — — — —
37 1983 10–9 52.6% — 1,788 3 53 — — — — — — —
38 1984 6–11 35.3% #61 1,729 3 53 — — — — — — —
39 1985 7–9 43.8% — 1,712 3 53 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Wade Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1968 22 5 27 81.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 17 4 21 81.0% 22 4 26 84.6% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1969 20 4 24 83.3% 18 6 24 75.0% 26 6 32 81.3% 18 2 20 90.0% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1970 8 1 9 88.9% 21 7 28 75.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1971 13 3 16 81.3% 19 4 23 82.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 17 3 20 85.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 29 8 37 78.4% 26 8 34 76.5% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1973 12 2 14 85.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1974 13 2 15 86.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 23 6 29 79.3% 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1975 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 24 4 28 85.7% 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 1977 9 3 12 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 26 12 38 68.4% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 12 3 15 80.0% 28 15 43 65.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 20 11 31 64.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1985 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 195 63 258 75.6% 149 68 217 68.7% 206 68 274 75.2% 313 115 428 73.1% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Wade Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1968 1941 139.9 — — — — +231 -179 -48 76.3% +2.05 16–6 (73%) — — -3.62 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1969 2123 150.9 — — — — +277 -251 -28 79.4% +2.10 10–8 (56%) — — -6.09 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1970 2091 154.6 — — — — +193 -118 +28 71.2% +1.54 13–7 (65%) 3–2 (60%) 101.5 -9.67 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 1971 2177 159.9 — — — — +99 -65 -32 77.7% +2.05 15–5 (75%) 10–1 (91%) 110.7 -4.40 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 1972 2146 164.1 — — — — +197 -62 +12 73.6% +1.91 9–9 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 93.0 -6.36 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 1973 2163 164.2 — — — — +178 -120 +32 77.2% +2.30 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 -3.22 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 1974 2198 161.9 — — — — +192 -153 -69 74.7% +1.80 13–7 (65%) 10–4 (71%) 100.5 -7.82 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 1975 2324 169.2 — — — — +74 -202 -120 76.0% +1.83 17–4 (81%) 5–8 (38%) 103.0 -7.49 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 1976 2286 166.6 — — — — +80 — -21 66.7% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 98.9 -7.47 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 1977 2279 169.5 — — — — +16 -212 +97 71.6% +1.68 8–2 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 104.2 -7.25 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
32 1978 2255 167.3 — — — — +53 — +84 70.0% +1.40 16–8 (67%) 11–8 (58%) 101.1 -6.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 2071 163.5 — — — — +33 -44 +208 67.1% +1.16 5–8 (38%) 9–3 (75%) 96.6 -3.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 1875 153.2 — — — — +110 +110 +329 55.6% +0.31 10–9 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 92.2 -1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1822 138.3 — — — — +65 +113 +274 53.7% +0.38 10–8 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 92.3 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1748 125.3 — — — — +80 +75 +267 34.8% -1.15 4–4 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -2.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1789 124.6 — — — — +12 +1 +228 48.9% -0.20 5–2 (71%) 4–1 (80%) 103.1 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1984 1729 127.3 — — — — +34 — +210 41.9% -0.84 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1985 1712 118.6 — — — — +5 -4 +189 44.4% -0.72 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.6 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2325 162.8 — — — — +117 -112 +38 70.0% +1.48 180–106 (63%) 88–71 (55%) 97.5 -6.85 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.