H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 14-2
Virginia Wade holds a 14–2 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 10–1 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1980 Boston semifinal 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
14
–
2
16 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1980* | Boston | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 7-6 7-6 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1979* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-1 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1979* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mima Jausovec | 7-5 6-4 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1979* | Hollywood | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-3 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1978* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-0 6-4 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1978* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-2 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1977 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1977* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 7-5 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1977* | Hollywood | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-3 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1976* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1975* | London | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-2 7-5 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1975* | Akron | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-2 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1974* | London | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-3 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1974* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-2 7-6(2) | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1974* | Newport | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-4 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Wade | Mima Jausovec | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 |
| 22 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 |
| 23 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 |
| 24 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 |
| 25 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 |
| 26 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 |
| 27 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 |
| 29 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 |
| 31 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |