H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Virginia Wade vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 16-0

Virginia Wade holds a 16–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 4–0 on carpet and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1981 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Wade
GBR Age 81 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
16 – 0
16 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Wade 6-3 6-7 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 3, 1981* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Virginia Wade 7-6 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 21, 1979* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Nov 10, 1978* R16 Oldsmar WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Apr 1, 1977* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Feb 6, 1976* R32 Akron WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Wade 6-4 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jan 21, 1976* R32 Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Nov 9, 1975* R16 Paris WTA 500 Carpet
Virginia Wade 3-6 6-1 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 24, 1975* QF Westchester WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 21, 1975* QF Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Virginia Wade 7-6(2) 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 5, 1974* SF Houston WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Wade 6-4 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Mar 9, 1974* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jul 1, 1973* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Virginia Wade 6-2 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 16, 1973* QF Nottingham WTA 250 Grass
Virginia Wade 6-0 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Dec 2, 1972* SF Buenos Aires WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Wade 6-1 4-6 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Apr 24, 1971* QF Catania WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Wade 6-3 6-0 Pam Teeguarden Match data Nov 2, 1968* QF Port Talbot WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Wade #138 #2 — 2,326 865 313 73.4% 3 0 0 2 48 53
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Wade Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1968 85–19 81.7% — 1,940 1 4 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1969 82–18 82.0% — 2,122 1 11 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1970 69–22 75.8% — 2,090 1 16 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1971 63–14 81.8% — 2,177 1 24 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1972 76–24 76.0% — 2,145 2 29 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1973 63–16 79.7% — 2,163 2 35 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1974 60–16 78.9% — 2,202 2 40 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1975 65–14 82.3% #2 2,324 2 46 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 1976 48–17 73.8% #3 2,266 2 48 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 1977 50–18 73.5% #4 2,272 3 50 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 1978 69–25 73.4% #4 2,251 3 53 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 1979 51–26 66.2% #8 2,069 3 53 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 1980 30–21 58.8% — 1,872 3 53 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4
35 1981 25–21 54.3% — 1,820 3 53 — — — — — — —
36 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,746 3 53 — — — — — — —
37 1983 10–9 52.6% — 1,787 3 53 — — — — — — —
38 1984 6–11 35.3% #61 1,728 3 53 — — — — — — —
39 1985 7–9 43.8% #62 1,711 3 53 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Wade Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1968 22 5 27 81.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 17 4 21 81.0% 22 4 26 84.6% 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1969 20 4 24 83.3% 18 6 24 75.0% 26 6 32 81.3% 18 2 20 90.0% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1970 8 1 9 88.9% 21 7 28 75.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1971 13 3 16 81.3% 19 4 23 82.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 17 3 20 85.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 29 8 37 78.4% 26 8 34 76.5% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1973 12 2 14 85.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1974 13 2 15 86.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 23 6 29 79.3% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1975 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 24 4 28 85.7% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1977 9 3 12 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 26 12 38 68.4% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 1978 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 12 3 15 80.0% 28 15 43 65.1% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 1979 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1985 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 195 63 258 75.6% 149 67 216 69.0% 206 68 274 75.2% 313 115 428 73.1% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Wade Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1968 1941 139.9 — — — — +231 -179 -48 76.3% +2.05 16–6 (73%) — — -3.62 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1969 2123 150.9 — — — — +277 -251 -28 79.4% +2.10 10–8 (56%) — — -6.09 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1970 2091 154.6 — — — — +193 -118 +28 71.2% +1.54 13–7 (65%) 3–2 (60%) 101.5 -9.67 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1971 2177 159.9 — — — — +99 -65 -32 77.7% +2.05 15–5 (75%) 10–1 (91%) 110.7 -4.40 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1972 2146 164.1 — — — — +197 -62 +12 73.6% +1.91 9–9 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 93.0 -6.10 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1973 2163 164.2 — — — — +178 -120 +32 77.2% +2.30 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 -3.17 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1974 2203 161.1 — — — — +186 -154 -74 75.6% +1.87 13–7 (65%) 10–4 (71%) 100.5 -7.22 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1975 2324 169.2 — — — — +73 -200 -121 76.2% +1.83 16–4 (80%) 5–8 (38%) 102.4 -6.74 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 1976 2267 165.3 — — — — +93 — -21 66.7% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 98.8 -6.74 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 1977 2273 169.3 — — — — +19 -205 +88 71.6% +1.68 8–2 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 104.2 -7.33 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 1978 2252 167.0 — — — — +51 — +76 70.0% +1.40 16–8 (67%) 11–8 (58%) 101.2 -6.47 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 1979 2070 163.2 — — — — +32 -41 +200 67.1% +1.16 5–8 (38%) 9–3 (75%) 96.6 -3.31 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 1980 1873 153.0 — — — — +108 +111 +320 55.6% +0.31 10–9 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 92.3 -1.39 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
35 1981 1821 137.9 — — — — +64 +114 +265 53.7% +0.38 10–8 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1747 125.1 — — — — +79 +77 +259 34.8% -1.15 4–4 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 96.8 -2.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1788 124.5 — — — — +12 +1 +221 48.9% -0.20 5–2 (71%) 4–1 (80%) 103.2 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1984 1729 127.2 — — — — +32 — +204 41.9% -0.84 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1985 1711 118.5 — — — — +4 -4 +186 44.4% -0.72 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.6 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2327 162.6 — — — — +117 -111 +35 70.0% +1.48 179–106 (63%) 88–71 (55%) 97.5 -6.60 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.