H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 16-0
Virginia Wade holds a 16–0 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 4–0 on carpet and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1981 US Open first round 6-3 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
16
–
0
16 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1979* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Virginia Wade | 7-6 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1978* | Oldsmar | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1977* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1976* | Akron | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1976* | Landover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1975* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1975* | Westchester | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Virginia Wade | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1975* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1974* | Houston | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1974* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jul 1, 1973* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1973* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Dec 2, 1972* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-0 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1971* | Catania | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1968* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-0 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Wade | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |