H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-0
Virginia Wade holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Wade leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1985 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Virginia Wade | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Wade | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |