H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Shirley Bloomer H2H: 1-0
Virginia Wade holds a 1–0 lead over Shirley Bloomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Wade leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1971 Fulham third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1971* | Fulham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-4 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Shirley Bloomer | — | — | — | 1,769 | 84 | 56 | 60.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Virginia Wade | Shirley Bloomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1968 | 18–7 | 72.0% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1969 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1970 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1971 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1973 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | 1979 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |