H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Sue Barker H2H: 11-6
Virginia Wade holds a 11–6 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 7–6 on carpet and 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1980 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
11
–
6
17 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1980* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-0 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1979 | Avon Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Carpet | Sue Barker | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1979* | Boston | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Sue Barker | 7-6 6-4 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1979* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1977* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1977 | Tucson | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Virginia Wade | (w/o) | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1977* | Dallas | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-4 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1977* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-4 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1977* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-5 (ret.) | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1976* | London | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1976 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Carpet | Sue Barker | 7-5 7-6(4) | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1976 | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | BR | Carpet | Virginia Wade | [31-21] | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1976* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-1 2-6 7-6(4) | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1975* | Paris | WTA 500 | F | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-7(3) 9-7 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1975* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1974* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 7-5 6-3 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1972* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Wade | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |